Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

isurg

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. CPU scam: Chuwi CoreBook X uses AMD Ryzen 5 5500U instead of 7430U

CPU scam: Chuwi CoreBook X uses AMD Ryzen 5 5500U instead of 7430U

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
15 Posts 6 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F floofloof@lemmy.ca

    They're from different generations though. 5500U is Zen 2 while 7430U is Zen 3.

    empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
    empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    That's my bad for not remembering AMD's fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

    That said, I went and looked up both models, they are both listed as using the FP6 interface. So they are electrically and mechanically compatible, likely just needing a bios update, my point is still valid.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com

      That's my bad for not remembering AMD's fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

      That said, I went and looked up both models, they are both listed as using the FP6 interface. So they are electrically and mechanically compatible, likely just needing a bios update, my point is still valid.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      That’s my bad for not remembering AMD’s fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

      Atrocious compared to Intel? The first CPU with the name Core i7 was released in 2008, but Intel is still releasing a CPU named Core i7 as recently as 2023. They both suck, but in different ways.

      empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

        That’s my bad for not remembering AMD’s fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

        Atrocious compared to Intel? The first CPU with the name Core i7 was released in 2008, but Intel is still releasing a CPU named Core i7 as recently as 2023. They both suck, but in different ways.

        empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
        empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
        empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Everyone's nomenclature sucks after 2016. Model numbers don't mean anything is what I mean lol

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comE empireoflove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com

          Everyone's nomenclature sucks after 2016. Model numbers don't mean anything is what I mean lol

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Honestly, we know where the root of this problem came from. Back in the 1990s Intel broke with convention of using ever increasing numeric model numbers

          • 8086
          • 8088
          • 80186
          • 80286
          • 80386
          • 80486
          • Pentium ...wait, what?! Not 80586? Nope.

          Intel didn't like that other CPU manufacturers of x86 CPUs (AMD, Cyrix, IBM) could use the same numbering scheme. So Intel created "Pentium" because it could be copyrighted/trademarked so other companies couldn't use it.

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

            Honestly, we know where the root of this problem came from. Back in the 1990s Intel broke with convention of using ever increasing numeric model numbers

            • 8086
            • 8088
            • 80186
            • 80286
            • 80386
            • 80486
            • Pentium ...wait, what?! Not 80586? Nope.

            Intel didn't like that other CPU manufacturers of x86 CPUs (AMD, Cyrix, IBM) could use the same numbering scheme. So Intel created "Pentium" because it could be copyrighted/trademarked so other companies couldn't use it.

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            There is no 80486. It's called the i486.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com

              There is no 80486. It's called the i486.

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              #11

              Such a confident answer! And so incorrect too!

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

                Such a confident answer! And so incorrect too!

                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                That's a model number, not a name. The first Pentium had a model number of A80501, but you wouldn't seriously claim that it's really the 80501, would you?

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                  That's a model number, not a name. The first Pentium had a model number of A80501, but you wouldn't seriously claim that it's really the 80501, would you?

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  #13

                  Read my prior post, I specifically SAID it was a model number.

                  You're embarrassing yourself with your pedantry. You said 80486 didn't exist. It did. Seriously, quit while you're behind here.

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

                    Read my prior post, I specifically SAID it was a model number.

                    You're embarrassing yourself with your pedantry. You said 80486 didn't exist. It did. Seriously, quit while you're behind here.

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    Oops, my mistake, you were wrong about the Pentium, then, not the 486. Its model number, as I said, was A80501. You switched from model numbers to names.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                      Oops, my mistake, you were wrong about the Pentium, then, not the 486. Its model number, as I said, was A80501. You switched from model numbers to names.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Oops, my mistake

                      Apology accepted. Have a great day!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups