Do you ever revise your upvotes for a particular sub-thread/conversant when you get the sense they are either bad-faith or do not have sufficient knowledge to justify their participation or comments?

[cheese_greater@lemmy.world]

This post did not contain any content.

[jet@hackertalks.com]

If I think the content is a net positive for Lemmy you get a upvote, even if I disagree, even if I don't like you.

So that means even if someone later reveals themselves to be an asshat, they are still adding to Lemmy's ecosystem and get to keep their upvotes.

Update: but I'm not a saint, if someone is downvoting me I'll downvote them right back