Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

isurg

  1. Home
  2. Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
  3. California becomes the first state to phase ultraprocessed food out of school meals

California becomes the first state to phase ultraprocessed food out of school meals

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
health
6 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
    return2ozma@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
    return2ozma@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    California becomes the first state to phase ultraprocessed food out of school meals

    A new law will make California the first state to phase some ultraprocessed food out of school meals.

    favicon

    NBC News (www.nbcnews.com)

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldR return2ozma@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      California becomes the first state to phase ultraprocessed food out of school meals

      A new law will make California the first state to phase some ultraprocessed food out of school meals.

      favicon

      NBC News (www.nbcnews.com)

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jet@hackertalks.com
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      It considers foods and beverages “ultraprocessed” if they contain one or more additives (such as stabilizers, thickeners, colorings or nonnutritive sweeteners), plus high levels of saturated fat, sodium or added sugar.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jet@hackertalks.com

        It considers foods and beverages “ultraprocessed” if they contain one or more additives (such as stabilizers, thickeners, colorings or nonnutritive sweeteners), plus high levels of saturated fat, sodium or added sugar.

        N This user is from outside of this forum
        N This user is from outside of this forum
        nurse_robot@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        You're being intentionally misleading

        The law creates a separate definition for “ultraprocessed food of concern,” and those products are the target of the new ban.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N nurse_robot@lemmy.world

          You're being intentionally misleading

          The law creates a separate definition for “ultraprocessed food of concern,” and those products are the target of the new ban.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jet@hackertalks.com
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Well nurse robot. I don't know what you want from me, I read the article and I provided what I thought was the relevant quote.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jet@hackertalks.com

            Well nurse robot. I don't know what you want from me, I read the article and I provided what I thought was the relevant quote.

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            nurse_robot@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            The quote you provided was immediately followed by my quote, which explained that what you quoted was NOT the language, wording, or definition of the bill being passed. I think you can understand why a reasonable person would find your cherry picked quote to be misleading, jet.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N nurse_robot@lemmy.world

              The quote you provided was immediately followed by my quote, which explained that what you quoted was NOT the language, wording, or definition of the bill being passed. I think you can understand why a reasonable person would find your cherry picked quote to be misleading, jet.

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              jet@hackertalks.com
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              You can't speak to my intentions. You can say the quote was inadequate, you can say there's a better quote, but to say I was trying to mislead people is a personal attack and I don't appreciate that

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups