Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

isurg

  1. Home
  2. sh.itjust.works Main Community
  3. 2 Instances are being used for coordinated vote manipulation, and should be defederated. chinese.lol lemmy.doesnotexist.club

2 Instances are being used for coordinated vote manipulation, and should be defederated. chinese.lol lemmy.doesnotexist.club

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved sh.itjust.works Main Community
main
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    cross-posted from: https://hackertalks.com/post/8713785

    The instances being used are

    • lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    • chinese.lol

    Here is an example of the coordinated downvoting https://hackertalks.com/post/8692093

    Of course its a controversial user who got someone angry enough to automated downvoting !DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today

    But you can see every post they make gets 53ish downvotes from these two instances, plus some organic ones after a few hours.

    Current downvoting Accounts
    :::spoiler bot-list

    LightIsland@chinese.lol
    MagnificentRow@chinese.lol
    FondKnowledge@chinese.lol
    SillyTowel95@chinese.lol
    HelplessDear@chinese.lol
    SomberBrain@chinese.lol
    InexperiencedCloset@chinese.lol
    NecessaryPerson11@chinese.lol
    ClosedEmployment@chinese.lol
    CoarseHair420@chinese.lol
    BurlyChampionship49@chinese.lol
    ZigzagNatural@chinese.lol
    QuestionableDirt@chinese.lol
    ProudDeparture@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    VigilantExtension17@lemmy.today
    JoyousDouble@chinese.lol
    UnitedPatience@chinese.lol
    MajesticArea@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    SinfulConference@chinese.lol
    MoralDivide96@chinese.lol
    LeadingCarry65@chinese.lol
    FrillyOpinion38@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    LimitedDiscount49@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    ForkedScreen@chinese.lol
    MediumChemistry13@chinese.lol
    xXxLawfulGrassxXx@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    VisibleSentence@chinese.lol
    AcidicLawyer90@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    PriceySink14@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    ExcellentBeach@chinese.lol
    VivaciousNews@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    LankyIndependent32@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    SpeedyFault@chinese.lol
    ConcreteHall89@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    WorthyPoint12@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    SurprisedAdult99@chinese.lol
    FlashyCrack@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    MasculineBeing@chinese.lol
    RichWeird@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    DryCash97@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    AuthorizedChair@chinese.lol
    SlimKiss@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    AromaticRoof78@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    BewitchedInterview@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    ImaginaryDraw@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    PertinentGround@chinese.lol
    SinfulAssumption@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    AwkwardAnybody30@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    UnwillingRestaurant@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    InsubstantialOven@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
    :::

    A individual user airing their personal biases and manipulating lemmy isn't good for the community, regardless of how you feel about their target. This is a really bad thing (tm)

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

      cross-posted from: https://hackertalks.com/post/8713785

      The instances being used are

      • lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      • chinese.lol

      Here is an example of the coordinated downvoting https://hackertalks.com/post/8692093

      Of course its a controversial user who got someone angry enough to automated downvoting !DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today

      But you can see every post they make gets 53ish downvotes from these two instances, plus some organic ones after a few hours.

      Current downvoting Accounts
      :::spoiler bot-list

      LightIsland@chinese.lol
      MagnificentRow@chinese.lol
      FondKnowledge@chinese.lol
      SillyTowel95@chinese.lol
      HelplessDear@chinese.lol
      SomberBrain@chinese.lol
      InexperiencedCloset@chinese.lol
      NecessaryPerson11@chinese.lol
      ClosedEmployment@chinese.lol
      CoarseHair420@chinese.lol
      BurlyChampionship49@chinese.lol
      ZigzagNatural@chinese.lol
      QuestionableDirt@chinese.lol
      ProudDeparture@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      VigilantExtension17@lemmy.today
      JoyousDouble@chinese.lol
      UnitedPatience@chinese.lol
      MajesticArea@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      SinfulConference@chinese.lol
      MoralDivide96@chinese.lol
      LeadingCarry65@chinese.lol
      FrillyOpinion38@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      LimitedDiscount49@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      ForkedScreen@chinese.lol
      MediumChemistry13@chinese.lol
      xXxLawfulGrassxXx@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      VisibleSentence@chinese.lol
      AcidicLawyer90@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      PriceySink14@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      ExcellentBeach@chinese.lol
      VivaciousNews@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      LankyIndependent32@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      SpeedyFault@chinese.lol
      ConcreteHall89@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      WorthyPoint12@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      SurprisedAdult99@chinese.lol
      FlashyCrack@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      MasculineBeing@chinese.lol
      RichWeird@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      DryCash97@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      AuthorizedChair@chinese.lol
      SlimKiss@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      AromaticRoof78@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      BewitchedInterview@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      ImaginaryDraw@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      PertinentGround@chinese.lol
      SinfulAssumption@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      AwkwardAnybody30@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      UnwillingRestaurant@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      InsubstantialOven@lemmy.doesnotexist.club
      :::

      A individual user airing their personal biases and manipulating lemmy isn't good for the community, regardless of how you feel about their target. This is a really bad thing (tm)

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      kreskin@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      threelonmuskteers whats up with this?
      https://lemmy.world/post/35942590?scrollToComments=true

      And before you say its not relevant, I question your presence on lemmy at all if this is how you participate. Especially as on this topic you go on about the "good for the community".
      Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kreskin@lemmy.world

        threelonmuskteers whats up with this?
        https://lemmy.world/post/35942590?scrollToComments=true

        And before you say its not relevant, I question your presence on lemmy at all if this is how you participate. Especially as on this topic you go on about the "good for the community".
        Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        on this topic you go on about the “good for the community”

        Those are technically @jet@hackertalks.com's words, not mine, but I agree with them and thought it worth crossposting.

        Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

        In one specific community, I'm experimenting with the moderation policy for niche communities, also described by @jet@hackertalks.com. Feel free to have a read through; let me know if you have any further questions.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

          on this topic you go on about the “good for the community”

          Those are technically @jet@hackertalks.com's words, not mine, but I agree with them and thought it worth crossposting.

          Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

          In one specific community, I'm experimenting with the moderation policy for niche communities, also described by @jet@hackertalks.com. Feel free to have a read through; let me know if you have any further questions.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jet@hackertalks.com
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Why are we necroing 5 month old posts to ask questions about a current post?

          I question your presence on lemmy at all if this is how you participate. Especially as on this topic you go on about the “good for the community”. Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

          This is rather authoritarian.....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups