“Users don’t like MacOS’s liquid glass, especially not me, but they released it anyway and this is bad.”

Ah thanks, so a slop article that barely belongs in the community here. Got it.

Come on dude, please use your own brain. The article is not AI slop - it is an informed rant about an UI topic from someone who knows what they are talking about. Please read the fucking article before accusing it of being AI slop - I mean, your whole post is kind slop. Just writing "TL;DR" and then spitting wild accusations and pronouncing that something does not belong into the community after reading a misleading one-sentence summary is sloppy as fuck. You can do better, dude!

Who's talking about AI? And there is no article, not even a summary. It's just a link dump.

What are you talking about? Just click on the link and read the article. Like, well, you should do with every link that gets submitted here in this community.

I will not read every article.

That's ok - but why would you then want to discuss an article you don't want to read on the internet?

Good question. I read the comments to find out if it is worth reading. Also much of the time, the comments are more interesting than the article, so I just have a discussion in the comments with the headline and other comments as the jumping off point.

I get where you're going here and I do the same as far as reading, but before I post I make it a point to actually read the article. Otherwise I may be forming and asking questions clearly already addressed or are completely divorced from the actual topic because I lack the articles context.

I feel it is part of the mutual respect with other posters to not waste their time asking questions already answered (in the article) or derailing the conversation because I don't know what conversation I'm in.