Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

isurg

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. The Pentagon’s Claude Use in Iran Is a Reminder that Anthropic Never Objected to Military Use

The Pentagon’s Claude Use in Iran Is a Reminder that Anthropic Never Objected to Military Use

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
5 Posts 3 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    fallenwalnut@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43768262

    Some may have believed they were against AI being used for war. They just don’t want it to make the final kill decision.

    The argument given by those supporting them is that AI in the military was inevitable, so their position is a reasonable one.

    Link Preview Image
    The Pentagon’s Claude Use in Iran Is a Reminder that Anthropic Never Objected to Military Use

    The company objected to hypothetical future use cases, not anything the military is currently doing.

    favicon

    Gizmodo (gizmodo.com)

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F fallenwalnut@lemmy.world

      cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43768262

      Some may have believed they were against AI being used for war. They just don’t want it to make the final kill decision.

      The argument given by those supporting them is that AI in the military was inevitable, so their position is a reasonable one.

      Link Preview Image
      The Pentagon’s Claude Use in Iran Is a Reminder that Anthropic Never Objected to Military Use

      The company objected to hypothetical future use cases, not anything the military is currently doing.

      favicon

      Gizmodo (gizmodo.com)

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      criticon@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Is there a "good-ish" AI chatbot? I uninstalled chatgpt and started using claude over the weekend 🤡

      I don't use it that much, maybe a couple of questions a week and some help understanding Japanese grammar

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C criticon@lemmy.ca

        Is there a "good-ish" AI chatbot? I uninstalled chatgpt and started using claude over the weekend 🤡

        I don't use it that much, maybe a couple of questions a week and some help understanding Japanese grammar

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Depends on your definition of "good-ish". Do you mean:

        • performance/accuracy?
        • ethical origin?
        • ethical ongoing operation?
        • privacy/future data harvesting concerns?

        Running one locally on your own hardware would likely reach "good-ish" with some sacrifices against performance/accuracy (unless you've got a lot of expensive hardware to run very large models). As far as ethical origins, there are few small models trained on public domain/nonstolen content, but their functions are far more limited.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

          Depends on your definition of "good-ish". Do you mean:

          • performance/accuracy?
          • ethical origin?
          • ethical ongoing operation?
          • privacy/future data harvesting concerns?

          Running one locally on your own hardware would likely reach "good-ish" with some sacrifices against performance/accuracy (unless you've got a lot of expensive hardware to run very large models). As far as ethical origins, there are few small models trained on public domain/nonstolen content, but their functions are far more limited.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          criticon@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I mean good-ish in the lesser-evil type of thing. I don't expect any of those to be 100% ethical but there are some that are a lot worse than others

          I don't really have a computer capable of running a local AI. I have an i3 laptop from around 6 years ago with 12gb of RAM and integrated graphics

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C criticon@lemmy.ca

            I mean good-ish in the lesser-evil type of thing. I don't expect any of those to be 100% ethical but there are some that are a lot worse than others

            I don't really have a computer capable of running a local AI. I have an i3 laptop from around 6 years ago with 12gb of RAM and integrated graphics

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I mean good-ish in the lesser-evil type of thing. I don’t expect any of those to be 100% ethical but there are some that are a lot worse than others

            Ethics are subjective. "Good-ish" to you may mean you're fine if its trained on copyrighted works as long as it wasn't done with electricity from diesel generators belching exhaust into the local Memphis atmosphere (I'm looking at you Grok). Llama doesn't do the diesel generator thing, but its a product of Facebook corporation. So is that "good-ish" to you or not? I don't know. That's up to you.

            It may not be fast, but your i3 laptop with 12GB of system RAM can absolutely run a local LLM. This is where that "performance/accuracy" question I raised comes in. It won't be very fast, and you won't be able to run the most common large models like GPT-5 etc. However, if your needs are light, light models exist. Give this a read

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups