Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

isurg

  1. Home
  2. Science Memes
  3. same shit every day, on god

same shit every day, on god

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Science Memes
sciencememes
10 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fossilesque@mander.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
    fossilesque@mander.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
    fossilesque@mander.xyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    H S ininewcrow@lemmy.caI 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • fossilesque@mander.xyzF fossilesque@mander.xyz
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      H This user is from outside of this forum
      H This user is from outside of this forum
      henrivolney@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Every damn power plant is a glorified steam engine

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fossilesque@mander.xyzF fossilesque@mander.xyz
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        someamateur@sh.itjust.works
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I wonder if nuclear would get more traction If it was pitched as enhanced steam power instead

        zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S someamateur@sh.itjust.works

          I wonder if nuclear would get more traction If it was pitched as enhanced steam power instead

          zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zarathustra0@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I wonder how fast we could get a steam train to go if we stuck a suitably shaped non-critical amount of plutonium in the firebox.

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fossilesque@mander.xyzF fossilesque@mander.xyz
            This post did not contain any content.
            Link Preview Image
            ininewcrow@lemmy.caI This user is from outside of this forum
            ininewcrow@lemmy.caI This user is from outside of this forum
            ininewcrow@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Why don't we just pipe our water all the way out to the sun and pipe the steam back to earth.

            medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H henrivolney@sh.itjust.works

              Every damn power plant is a glorified steam engine

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Hydro isn't. Nor is solar photo voltaic, wind, or tidal, but yeah, nearly everything else is. In a combined-cycle natural gas or diesel plant half of the power generated isn't steam power, but the other half is.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI ininewcrow@lemmy.ca

                Why don't we just pipe our water all the way out to the sun and pipe the steam back to earth.

                medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.world
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Oh yeah! I did that for my house. We have free heat and power. It's a bit of a pain in the ass to build the pipeline that far out and it took me many more hours than expected, but, the system toots along just fine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ zarathustra0@lemmy.world

                  I wonder how fast we could get a steam train to go if we stuck a suitably shaped non-critical amount of plutonium in the firebox.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  if we stuck a suitably shaped non-critical amount of plutonium in the firebox.

                  Non-critical? There isn't much energy released from natural decay compared to criticality. We created things like this to power space probes like the Voyager I and II craft. 4.5kg of this Plutonium created about 2500w of thermal energy the the beginning of its life and the power declines from there.

                  source

                  zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P partial_accumen@lemmy.world

                    if we stuck a suitably shaped non-critical amount of plutonium in the firebox.

                    Non-critical? There isn't much energy released from natural decay compared to criticality. We created things like this to power space probes like the Voyager I and II craft. 4.5kg of this Plutonium created about 2500w of thermal energy the the beginning of its life and the power declines from there.

                    source

                    zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zarathustra0@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    So I need 80 tons of it in my firebox?

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • zarathustra0@lemmy.worldZ zarathustra0@lemmy.world

                      So I need 80 tons of it in my firebox?

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Well, you'd then have another problem. Unlike coal/wood/oil fuel, you can't turn off radioactive decay.

                      You'd have megawatts (gigawatts?) of thermal energy boiling off all your water pretty quickly, and likely eventually melting down your steam engine firebox, and it would be that hot for decades!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups