Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

iSURG

  1. Home
  2. Discuss
  3. The whole article is interesting, but I thought that this was a good summary of the various rationalist subcultures:

The whole article is interesting, but I thought that this was a good summary of the various rationalist subcultures:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Discuss
4 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M This user is from outside of this forum
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    m_f@discuss.online
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The whole article is interesting, but I thought that this was a good summary of the various rationalist subcultures:

    But people who are drawn to the rationalist community by the Sequences often want to be in a cult. To be sure, no one wants to be exploited or traumatized. But they want some trustworthy authority to change the way they think until they become perfect, and then to assign them to their role in the grand plan to save humanity. They’re disappointed to discover a community made of mere mortals, with no brain tricks you can’t get from Statistics 101 and a good CBT workbook, whose approach to world problems involves a lot fewer grand plans and a lot more muddling through.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M m_f@discuss.online

      The whole article is interesting, but I thought that this was a good summary of the various rationalist subcultures:

      But people who are drawn to the rationalist community by the Sequences often want to be in a cult. To be sure, no one wants to be exploited or traumatized. But they want some trustworthy authority to change the way they think until they become perfect, and then to assign them to their role in the grand plan to save humanity. They’re disappointed to discover a community made of mere mortals, with no brain tricks you can’t get from Statistics 101 and a good CBT workbook, whose approach to world problems involves a lot fewer grand plans and a lot more muddling through.

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jet@hackertalks.com
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Does this mean people attracted to rationalist cults are looking for a way to avoid critical thinking of their own?

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jet@hackertalks.com

        Does this mean people attracted to rationalist cults are looking for a way to avoid critical thinking of their own?

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        m_f@discuss.online
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        IMO approximately nobody wants to avoid critical thinking, it's just easy to fall into the trap of not examining yourself for errors in thinking. It's kind of like this XKCD:

        The only way to improve over time is to have a genuine interest in becoming less wrong (à la the lesswrong.com people). Human nature is to become lazy after a time and becoming less wrong initially will give you better tools for defending errors in thinking.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M m_f@discuss.online

          IMO approximately nobody wants to avoid critical thinking, it's just easy to fall into the trap of not examining yourself for errors in thinking. It's kind of like this XKCD:

          The only way to improve over time is to have a genuine interest in becoming less wrong (à la the lesswrong.com people). Human nature is to become lazy after a time and becoming less wrong initially will give you better tools for defending errors in thinking.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          jet@hackertalks.com
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          We do love a good heuristic

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups