Hopefully that helps ground my intentions better. It does, and I very much appreciate you taking the time to explain your goal and help us both communicate better with each other. I wasn't trying to be needlessly hypercritical of your idea, especially because I didn't know it was in the early "napkin" phase before you had a chance to sort through the particulars. What would have helped me understand would be some language in your original post describing it was still in an early stage, and if you were to disclose if you were willing to have your ideal challenged yet or not. When you last line actually called for thoughts, I took that as an invitation to dig in and learn where you were going with it. I had assumed you had a fully realized system and I just wasn't understanding your methods for controlling for what I saw initially as shortcomings, so I was asking probing questions to see how your system addressed that. I'm all about spitballing on an unformed idea or an early version of something fully knowing it isn't complete or may have a fatal flaw in its early form. Sometimes finding a nugget of an idea or a concept is the starting point, and then the real work is building the system around it to overcome an unintended side effect. All ideas are welcome in that kind of collaborative space and some really interesting things can come from it. After you've had more time to think about your idea, I'd be happy to discuss it with you again in the future.