<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The Supreme Court significantly narrowed a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in a 6-3 ruling Wednesday, further eroding the impact of the landmark civil rights-era law.</p>
<p dir="auto">For decades, Section 2 — a provision that broadly outlawed discrimination in voting on the basis of race — has been interpreted to allow, and sometimes demand, the use of race-conscious data in redistricting, to protect the voting power of minorities.</p>
<p dir="auto">But the court’s new opinion, which split the justices along ideological lines, throws into question exactly how states can utilize race in their mapmaking process. The case involves a challenge to two majority-Black districts in Louisiana.</p>
<p dir="auto">Liberal groups had feared the court would fully gut the law, allowing red states to redraw maps nationwide and effectively lock in GOP control of Congress. Republicans, meanwhile, believe that considering race in drawing congressional districts is discriminatory and unconstitutional.</p>
</blockquote>


<div class="row mt-3"><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">

<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a class="text-decoration-none" href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/29/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-louisiana-00898123">
Just a moment...
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3"></p>
</div>
<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/29/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-louisiana-00898123" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://www.politico.com/favicon.ico" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width: 21px; max-height: 21px;" onerror="this.remove()"/>



<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0"> <span class="text-secondary">(www.politico.com)</span></p>
</a>
</div></div>]]></description><link>https://isurg.org/topic/4d11f9c7-0938-4e85-acc9-4678f7ba5529/supreme-court-limits-voting-rights-act</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 21:49:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://isurg.org/topic/4d11f9c7-0938-4e85-acc9-4678f7ba5529.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:18:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act on Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:34:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Fuck the SCOTUS.</p>
<p dir="auto">At least the hateful 6.</p>
]]></description><link>https://isurg.org/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/23470712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://isurg.org/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/23470712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.world]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:34:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>